Acta mathematica scientia, Series B >
ON DECOMPOSITION METHOD FOR ACOUSTIC WAVE SCATTERING BY MULTIPLE OBSTACLES
Received date: 2011-10-08
Online published: 2013-01-20
Supported by
This work is supported by NSFC (11071039, 11161130002), and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK2011584).
Consider acoustic wave scattering by multiple obstacles with different sound properties on the boundary, which can be modeled by a mixed boundary value problem for the Helmholtz equation in frequency domain. Compared with the standard scattering problem for one obstacle, the difficulty of such a new problem is the interaction of scattered wave by different obstacles. A decomposition method for solving this multiple scattering problem is developed. Using the boundary integral equation method, we decompose the total scattered field into a sum of contributions by separated obstacles. Each contribution corresponds to scattering problem of single obstacle. However, all the single scattering problems are coupled via the boundary conditions, representing the physical interaction of scattered wave by different obstacles. We prove the feasibility of such a decomposition. To compute these contributions efficiently, an iteration algorithm of Jacobi type is proposed, decoupling the interaction of scattered wave from the numerical points of view. Under the well-separation assumptions on multiple obstacles, we prove the convergence of iteration sequence generated by the Jacobi algorithm, and give the error estimate between exact scattered wave and the iteration solution in terms of the obstacle size and the minimal distance of multiple obstacles. Such a quantitative description reveals the essences of wave scattering by multiple obstacles. Numerical examples showing the accuracy and
convergence of our method are presented.
WANG Hai-Bing , LIU Ji-Jun . ON DECOMPOSITION METHOD FOR ACOUSTIC WAVE SCATTERING BY MULTIPLE OBSTACLES[J]. Acta mathematica scientia, Series B, 2013 , 33(1) : 1 -22 . DOI: 10.1016/S0252-9602(12)60191-X
[1] Antoine X, Chniti C, Ramdani K. On the numerical approximation of high-frequency acoustic multiple scattering problems by circular cylinders. J Comput Phys, 2008, 227: 1754–1771
[2] Antoine X, Geuzaine C, Ramdani K. Computational methods for multiple scattering at high frequency with applications to periodic structures calculations//Ehrhardt M (Ed.). Wave Propagation in Periodic Media-Analysis, Numerical Techniques and Practical Applications, Progress in Computational Physics, Vol 1. Bentham Science Publishers Ltd, 2009
[3] Balabane M. Boundary decomposition for Helmholtz and Maxwell equations 1: disjoint sub-scatterers. Asymptotic Analysis, 2004, 38: 1–10
[4] Bayliss A, Gunzburger M, Turkel E. Boundary conditions for the numerical solution of elliptic equations in exterior regions. SIAM J Appl Math, 1982, 42(2): 430–451
[5] B´erenger J P. A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves. J Comput Phys, 1994, 114(2): 185–200
[6] Cheng J, Liu J J, Nakamura G, Wang S Z. Recovery of multiple obstacles by probe method. Quart Applied Mathematics, 2009, 67(2): 221–247
[7] Colton D, Kress R. Integral Equation Methods in Scattering Theory. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1983
[8] Colton D, Kress R. Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnetic Scattering Theory. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1998
[9] David M. On a Dirichlet-Neumann-third mixed boundary value problem for the Helmholtz equation. Proc Royal Soc Edinburgh, 1983, 94A: 221–233
[10] Engquist B, Majda A. Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves. Math Comput, 1977, 31(139): 629–651
[11] Geuzaine C, Bruno J, Reitich F. On the O(1) solution of multiple-scattering problems. IEEE Trans Magn, 2005, 44(5): 1488–1491
[12] Ganesh M, Hawkins S C. Simulation of acoustic scattering by multiple obstacles in three dimension. ANZIAM J, 2008, 50: C31–C45
[13] Ganesh M, Hawkins S C. A high-order algorithm for multiple electromagnetic scattering in three dimen-sions. Numer Algor, 2009, 50: 469–510
[14] Givoli D. Recent advances in the DtN FE method. Arch Comput Methods Engrg, 1999, 6(2): 71–116
[15] Grote M J, Keller J B. On nonreflecting boundary conditions. J Comput Phys, 1995, 122(2): 231–243
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |