Articles

SOME RESULTS ON CONTROLLED FRAMES IN HILBERT SPACES

  • Kamran MUSAZADEH ,
  • Hassan KHANDANI
Expand
  • Department of Mathematics, College of Science, Mahabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahabad, Iran

Received date: 2015-06-25

  Online published: 2016-06-25

Supported by

Supported by IAU-Mahabad branch (51663931105001).

Abstract

We use two appropriate bounded invertible operators to define a controlled frame with optimal frame bounds. We characterize those operators that produces Parseval controlled frames also we state a way to construct nearly Parseval controlled frames. We introduce a new perturbation of controlled frames to obtain new frames from a given one. Also we reduce the distance of frames by appropriate operators and produce nearly dual frames from two given frames which are not dual frames for each other.

Cite this article

Kamran MUSAZADEH , Hassan KHANDANI . SOME RESULTS ON CONTROLLED FRAMES IN HILBERT SPACES[J]. Acta mathematica scientia, Series B, 2016 , 36(3) : 655 -665 . DOI: 10.1016/S0252-9602(16)30029-7

References

[1] Asgary M S, Khosravi A. Frames and bases of subspaces in Hilbert spaces. J Math Anal Appl, 2005, 308: 541-553
[2] Balan R, Casazza P G, Edidin D, Kutyniok G. A fundamental identity for Parseval frames. arXiv:math/0506357[math.FA]
[3] Balazs P, Antoine J-P, Grybo? A. Weighted and controlled frames: mutual relationship and first numerical properties. International Journal of Wavelets, Multiresolution and Information Processing, 2010, 8(1): 109-132
[4] Bodmann B G, Paulsen V I. Frame paths and error bounds for sigma-delta quantization. Appl Comput Harmon Anal, 2007, 22: 176-197
[5] Bogdanova I, Vandergheynst P, Antoine J P, Jacques L, Morvidone M. Stereographic wavelet frames on the sphere. Appl Comput Harmon Anal, 2005, 16: 223-252
[6] Casazza P G. Modern tools for WeylHeisenberg (Gabor) frame theory. Adv Imaging Electron Phys, 2001, 115: 1-127
[7] Casazza P G. Custom building finite frames//Wavelets, Frames and Operator Theory. Contemp Math, Vol 345. Providence, RI: Amer Math Soc, 2004: 61-86
[8] Casazza P G, Kutyniok G, Li S. Fusion frames and distributed processing. Appl Comput Harmon Anal, 2008, 25: 114-132
[9] Casazza P G, Kutyniok G. Finite Frames, Theory and Applications. Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis. Boston: Birkhauser, 2013
[10] Christensen O, Heil C. Perturbations of Banach frames and atomic decomposition. Math Nachr, 1997, 185: 33-47
[11] Christensen O. An Introduction to Frames and Riesz Bases. Boston: Birkhauser, 2003
[12] Christensen O, Eldar Y C. Oblique dual frames and shift-invariant spaces. Appl Comput Harmon Anal, 2004, 17: 48-68
[13] Christensen O. Frames and Bases. An Introductory Course. Boston: Birkhauser, 2008
[14] Daubechies I, Grossman A, Meyer Y. Painless nonorthogonal expansions. JMath Phys, 1986, 27: 1271-1283
[15] Duffin R J, Schaeffer A C. A class of nonhartmonic Fourier series. Trans Amer Math Soc, 1952, 72: 341-366
[16] Fornasier M. Quasi-orthogonal decompositions of structured frames. J Math Anal Appl, 2004, 289: 180-199
[17] Khosravi A, Musazadeh K. Controlled fusion frames. Methods of Functional Analysis and Topology, 2012, 18(3): 256-265
[18] Khosravi A, Musazadeh K. Fusion frames and g-frames. J Math Anal Appl, 2008, 342: 1068-1083
[19] Li S, Ogawa H. Pseudo frames for subspaces with application. J Fourier Anal Appl, 2004, 10: 409-431
[20] Murphy G J. C*-Algebra and Operator Theory. San Diego, California: Academic Press, 1990
[21] Rahimi A, Fereydooni A. Controlled G-Frames and Their G-Multipliers in Hilbert spaces. An ?t Univ Ovidius Constan?a, 2013, 21(2): 223-236
[22] Sun Q. Frames in spaces with finite rate of innovation. Adv Comput Math, 2008, 28: 301-329
[23] Sun W. G-frames and g-Riesz bases. J Math Anal Appl, 2006, 322(1): 437-452
[24] Sun W. Stability of g-frames. J Math Anal Appl, 2006, 326(2): 858-868

Outlines

/