Articles

AN EFFICIENT PARALLEL PROCESSING OPTIMAL CONTROL SCHEME FOR A CLASS OF NONLINEAR COMPOSITE SYSTEMS

  • A. JAJARMI ,
  • M. HAJIPOUR
Expand
  • 1. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Bojnord, P. O. Box 94531-1339, Bojnord, Iran;
    2. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Sahand University of Technology, P. O. Box 51335-1996, Tabriz, Iran

Received date: 2015-12-12

  Revised date: 2016-05-26

  Online published: 2017-06-25

Abstract

This article presents an efficient parallel processing approach for solving the optimal control problem of nonlinear composite systems. In this approach, the original high-order coupled nonlinear two-point boundary value problem (TPBVP) derived from the Pontryagin's maximum principle is first transformed into a sequence of lower-order decoupled linear time-invariant TPBVPs. Then, an optimal control law which consists of both feedback and forward terms is achieved by using the modal series method for the derived sequence. The feedback term specified by local states of each subsystem is determined by solving a matrix Riccati differential equation. The forward term for each subsystem derived from its local information is an infinite sum of adjoint vectors. The convergence analysis and parallel processing capability of the proposed approach are also provided. To achieve an accurate feedforward-feedback suboptimal control, we apply a fast iterative algorithm with low computational effort. Finally, some comparative results are included to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Cite this article

A. JAJARMI , M. HAJIPOUR . AN EFFICIENT PARALLEL PROCESSING OPTIMAL CONTROL SCHEME FOR A CLASS OF NONLINEAR COMPOSITE SYSTEMS[J]. Acta mathematica scientia, Series B, 2017 , 37(3) : 703 -721 . DOI: 10.1016/S0252-9602(17)30032-2

References

[1] Chen Y, Li W, Dai G, Aleksandrov A Y. Consensus analysis and design of linear interconnected multi-agent systems. Acta Mathematica Scientia, 2015, 35(6):1305-1317
[2] Bakule L. Decentralized control:An overview. Annual Reviews in Control, 2008, 32(1):87-98
[3] Hou Z G, Gupta M M, Nikiforuk P N, Tan M, Cheng L. A recurrent neural network for hierarchical control of interconnected dynamic systems. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2007, 18(2):466-481
[4] Tang G Y, Sun L. Optimal control for nonlinear interconnected large-scale systems:a successive approximation approach. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2005, 31(2):248-254
[5] Jajarmi A, Pariz N, Effati S, Kamyad A V. Infinite horizon optimal control for nonlinear interconnected large-scale dynamical systems with an application to optimal attitude control. Asian Journal of Control, 2012, 14(5):1239-1250[1] Chen Y, Li W, Dai G, Aleksandrov A Y. Consensus analysis and design of linear interconnected multi-agent systems. Acta Mathematica Scientia, 2015, 35(6):1305-1317
[6] Xie Y F, Gui W H, Jiang Z H, Huang C. Decentralized robust H output feedback control for value bounded uncertain large-scale interconnected systems. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 2010, 8(1):16-28
[7] Lei B, Fei S, Zhai J. Decentralized nonlinear robust coordinated control of UPFC and generators in multimachine power system via pseudo-generalized Hamiltonian theory. Asian Journal of Control, 2015, 17(5):1962-1971
[8] Li T, Wang D, Li J, Li Y. Adaptive decentralized NN control of nonlinear interconnected time-delay systems with input saturation. Asian Journal of Control, 2013, 15(2):533-542
[9] Wang H, Liu X, Chen B, Zhou Q. Adaptive fuzzy decentralized control for a class of pure-feedback largescale nonlinear systems. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2014, 75(3):449-460
[10] Huang S N, Tan K K, Lee T H. Nonlinear adaptive control of interconnected systems using neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2006, 17(1):243-246
[11] Pariz N, Shanechi H M, Vahedi E. Explaining and validating stressed power systems behavior using modal series. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2003, 18(2):778-785
[12] Shanechi H M, Pariz N, Vahedi E. General nonlinear modal representation of large scale power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2003, 18(3):1103-1109
[13] Wu F X, Wu H, Han Z X, Gan D Q. Validation of power system non-linear modal analysis methods. Electric Power Systems Research, 2007, 77(10):1418-1424
[14] Soltani S, Pariz N, Ghazi R. Extending the perturbation technique to the modal representation of nonlinear systems. Electric Power Systems Research, 2009, 79(8):1209-1215
[15] Khatibi M, Shanechi H M. Using modal series to analyze the transient response of oscillators. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, 2011, 39(2):127-134
[16] Zeinali R, Ghazi R, Pariz N. Nonlinear modal analysis of interaction between torsional modes and SVC controllers. Electric Power Systems Research, 2012, 91:61-70
[17] Wang W, Ma X. Transient analysis of low-voltage ride-through in three-phase grid-connected converter with LCL filter using the nonlinear modal series method. Electric Power Systems Research, 2013, 105:39-50
[18] Khatibi M, Shanechi H M. Using a modified modal series to analyse weakly nonlinear circuits. International Journal of Electronics, 2015, 102(9):1457-1474
[19] Shankar S. Nonlinear Systems:Analysis, Stability, and Control. Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics. New York:Springer-Verlag, 1999
[20] Kirk D E. Optimal Control Theory:An Introduction. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1970
[21] Junkins J L, Turner J D. Optimal Spacecraft Rotational Maneuvers. Amsterdam:Elsevier, 1986
[22] Ascher U M, Mattheij R M M, Russel R D. Numerical Solution of Boundary Value Problems for Ordinary Differential Equations. Philadelphia:SIAM, 1995
[23] Tsiotras P. Stabilization and optimality results for the attitude control problem. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1996, 19(4):772-779
Outlines

/