Although the existence and uniqueness of Strebel differentials are proved by Jenkins and Strebel, the specific constructions of Strebel differentials are difficult. Two special kinds of special Strebel differentials are constructed in [5, 6]. The Strebel rays [3] and the eventually distance minimizing rays [9] are important in Teichmüller spaces and moduli spaces, respectively. Motivated by the study of [3, 9], two special kinds of Strebel rays in the real hyper-elliptic subspace of Teichmüller space and two special kinds of EDM rays in the real hyper-elliptic subspace of moduli space are studied in this article.
Guangming HU
,
Yi QI
. THE REAL HYPER-ELLIPTIC SUBSPACES OF TEICHMÜLLER SPACE AND MODULI SPACE[J]. Acta mathematica scientia, Series B, 2019
, 39(4)
: 1121
-1135
.
DOI: 10.1007/s10473-019-0415-z
[1] Abikoff W. Degenerating Families of Riemann Surfaces. Annals of Mathematics, 1977, 105(2):29-44
[2] Amano M. On behavior of pairs of Teichmüller geodesic rays. Conformal Geometry and Dynamics of the American Mathematical Society, 2014, 18(2):8-30
[3] Amano M. The asymptotic behavior of Jenkins-Strebel rays. Conformal Geometry and Dynamics of the American Mathematical Society, 2014, 18(9):157-170
[4] Amburg N Y. An example of a regular Strebel differential. Russian Mathematical Surveys, 2002, 57(5):987-988
[5] Artamkin I V, Levitskaya Y A, Shabat G B. Examples of families of Strebel differentials on hyperelliptic curves. Functional Analysis and Its Applications, 2009, 43(2):140-142
[6] Bogatyrev A. Elementary construction of Jenkins-Strebel differentials. Mathematical Notes, 2012, 91(1):135-138
[7] Bogatyrev A. Extremal polynomials and Riemann surfaces. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012
[8] Bonatti C, Paris L. Roots in the mapping class groups. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 2009, 98(2):471-503
[9] Farb B, Masur H. Teichmüller geometry of moduli space, I:distance minimizing rays and the delignemumford compactification. Journal of Differential Geometry, 2008, 85(2):187-227
[10] Gardiner F P. Teichmüller theory and quadratic differentials. Wiley, 1987
[11] Hatcher A. Algebraic Topology. Cambridge University Press, 2002
[12] Herrlich F, Schmithuesen G. On the boundary of Teichmueller disks in Teichmueller and in Schottky space. Mathematics, 2007:293-349
[13] Hubbard J, Masur H. Quadratic differentials and foliations. Acta Mathematica, 1979, 142(1):221-274
[14] Imayoshi Y, Taniguchi M. An introduction to Teichmüller spaces. Springer-Verlag, 1992
[15] Ji L, Macpherson R. Geometry of compactifications of locally symmetric spaces. Annales De Linstitut Fourier, 2002, 52(2):457
[16] Katok A B, Hasselblatt B. Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems. Cambridge University Press, 1995
[17] Kerckhoff S P. The asymptotic geometry of Teichmüller space. Topology, 1978, 19(1):23-41
[18] Letho O. Univalent Functions and Teichmüller Spaces. Springer Berlin, 2012
[19] Liu J. On the Existence of Jenkins-Strebel Differentials. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 2004, 36(3):365-377
[20] Lochak P. On arithmetic curves in the moduli space of curves. Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu, 2005, 4(3):443-508
[21] Masur H. The Jenkins Strebel differentials with one cylinder are dense. Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici, 1979, 54(1):179-184
[22] Nag S. The Complex Analytic Theory of Teichmüller Space. Wiley, 1988
[23] Natanzon S M. Moduli of Riemann Surfaces, Real Algebraic Curves, and Their Superanalogs. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, 2004, 7(55):11-13
[24] Song F, Qi Y, Hu G. The eventually distance minimizing rays in moduli space. Acta Mathematica Scientia, 2018, 38(3):950-964
[25] Strebel K. Quadratic Differentials. Springer, 1984
[26] Teichmüller O. Extremale quasikonforme Abbildungen und quadratische Differentiate. Abh Preuss Akad Wiss Math-Natur KI Nr, 1940, 22:1-197
[27] Walsh C. The asymptotic geometry of the Teichmüller metric. arXiv preprint arXiv, 2012:1210.5565
