This article considers the following higher-dimensional quasilinear parabolic-parabolic-ODE chemotaxis system with generalized Logistic source and homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions \[ \left\{ \begin{array}{lll} u_t=\nabla\cdot(D(u)\nabla u)-\nabla \cdot (S(u)\nabla v)+f(u), &x\in \Omega,t>0\\ v_t = \Delta v+w-v, &x\in \Omega, t>0,\\ w_t=u-w, &x\in \Omega, t>0, \end{array} \right.\] in a bounded domain $\Omega \subset R^{n}(n\geq 2)$ with smooth boundary $\partial\Omega$, where the diffusion coefficient $D(u)$ and the chemotactic sensitivity function $S(u)$ are supposed to satisfy $D(u)\geq M_{1}(u+1)^{-\alpha}$ and $S(u)\leq M_{2}(u+1)^\beta$, respectively, where $M_{1},M_{2}>0$ and $\alpha, \beta\in R$. Moreover, the logistic source $f(u)$ is supposed to satisfy $f(u)\leq a-\mu u^{\gamma}$ with $\mu>0$, $\gamma\geq 1$, and $a\geq 0$. As $\alpha+2\beta<\gamma-1+\frac{2\gamma}{n}$, we show that the solution of the above chemotaxis system with sufficiently smooth nonnegative initial data is uniformly bounded.
Qingquan TANG
,
Qiao XIN
,
Chunlai MU
. BOUNDEDNESS OF THE HIGHER-DIMENSIONAL QUASILINEAR CHEMOTAXIS SYSTEM WITH GENERALIZED LOGISTIC SOURCE[J]. Acta mathematica scientia, Series B, 2020
, 40(3)
: 713
-722
.
DOI: 10.1007/s10473-020-0309-0
[1] Strohm S, Tyson R C, Powell J A. Pattern formation in a model for mountain pine beetle dispersal:linking model predictions to data. Bull Math Biol, 2013, 75(10):1778-1797
[2] Keller E F, Segel L A. Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability. J Theoret Biol, 1970, 26(3):399-415
[3] Hu B Y, Tao Y S. To the exclusion of blow-up in a three-dimensional chemotaxis-growth model with indirect attractant production. Math Mod Meth Appl Sci, 2016, 26(11):2111-2128
[4] Qiu S Y, Mu C L, Wang L C. Boundedness in the higher-dimensional quasilinear chemotaxis-growth system with indirect attractant production. Comput Math Appl, 2018, 75(9):3213-3223
[5] Li H Y, Tao Y S. Boundedness in a chemotaxis system with indirect signal production and generalized logistic souce. Appl Math Lett, 2018, 77(17):108-113
[6] Zhang Q S, Li Y X. Boundedness in a quasilinear fully parabolic Keller-Segel system with Logistic source. Z Angew Math Phys, 2015, 66(5):2473-2484
[7] Painter K J, Hillen T. Volume-filling and quorum-sensing in models for chemosensitive movement. Can Appl Math Q, 2002, 10(4):501-543
[8] Wang Z A, Hillen T. Classical solutions and pattern formation for a volume-filling chemotaxis model. Chaos, 2007, 17(3):37-108
[9] Wrzosek D. Model of chemotaxis with threshold density and singular diffusion. Nonlinear Anal TMA, 2010, 73(2):338-349
[10] Wang Z A, Winkler M, Wrzosek D. Global regularity versus infinite-time singularity formation in a chemotaxis model with volume-filling effect and degenerate diffusion. SIAM J Math Anal, 2012, 44(5):3502-3525
[11] Winkler M. Finite-time blow-up in the higher-dimensional parabolic-parabolic Keller-Segel system. J Math Pures Appl, 2013, 100(5):748-767
[12] Cieslak T, Stinner C. Finite-time blowup and global-in-time unbounded solutions to a parabolic-parabolic quasilinear Keller-Segel system in higher dimensions. J Differential Equations, 2011, 252(10):5832-5851
[13] Sugiyama Y. Time global existence and asymptotic behavior of solutions to degenerate quasilinear parabolic systems of chemotaxis. Differ Integral Equ, 2007, 20(2):133-180
[14] Laurencot P, Mizoguchi N. Finite time blowup for the parabolic-parabolic Keller-Segel system with critical diffusion. Ann Henri Poincare, 2017, 34(1):197-220
[15] Nagai T. Blow-up of radially symmetric solutions to a chemotaxis system. Adv Math Sci Appl, 1995, 5(2):581-601
[16] Tao Y S, Wang M. Global solution for a chemotactic-haptotactic model of cancer invasion. Nonlinearity, 2008, 21(10):2221-2238
[17] Tao Y S, Winkler M. A chemotaxis-haptotaxis model:the roles of nonlinear diffusion and logistic source. SIAM J Math Anal, 2011, 43(2):685-704
[18] Horstmann D, Winkler M. Boundedness vs. blow-up in a chemotaxis system. J Differential Equations, 2005, 215(1):52-107
[19] Nirenberg L. An extended interpolation inequality. Ann Scuola Norm Sci, 1966, 20(3):733-737
[20] Tao Y S, Wang Z A. Competing effects of attraction vs. repulsion in chemotaxis. Math Mod Meth Appl S, 2013, 23(1):1-36
[21] Alikakos N D. Lp bounds of solutions of reaction-diffusion equations. Commun Part Diff Eq, 1979, 4(8):827-868
