COMPARISON OF HOMOLOGIES AND AUTOMATIC EXTENSIONS OF INVARIANT DISTRIBUTIONS

  • Yangyang CHEN
Expand
  • School of Sciences, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
Yangyang CHEN,E-mail: chenyy@amss.ac.cn

Received date: 2022-03-18

  Revised date: 2022-07-12

  Online published: 2023-08-08

Supported by

*This work was supported by the Fundamental Research

Abstract

Let G be a reductive Nash group, acting on a Nash manifold X. Let Z be a G -stable closed Nash submanifold of X and denote by $U$ the complement of Z in X. Let $\chi$ be a character of G and denote by g the complexified Lie algebra of G. We give a sufficient condition for the natural linear map $H_{k}(g, S(U)\otimes\chi)\rightarrow H_{k}(g, S(X)\otimes\chi)$ between the Lie algebra homologies of Schwartz functions to be an isomorphism. For k=0, by considering the dual, we obtain the automatic extensions of $g$-invariant (twisted by -$\chi$) Schwartz distributions.

Cite this article

Yangyang CHEN . COMPARISON OF HOMOLOGIES AND AUTOMATIC EXTENSIONS OF INVARIANT DISTRIBUTIONS[J]. Acta mathematica scientia, Series B, 2023 , 43(4) : 1561 -1570 . DOI: 10.1007/s10473-023-0407-x

References

[1] Aizenbud A, Gourevitch D. Schwartz functions on Nash manifolds. Int Math Res Not, 2008, 2008(5): Art rnm155
[2] Aizenbud A, Gourevitch D. Smooth transfer of Kloostermann integrals (the Archimedean case). American Journal of Mathematics, 2013, 135: 143-182
[3] Aizenbud A, Gourevitch D. The de Rham theorem and Shapiro lemma for Schwartz functions on Nash manifolds. Israel J Math, 2010, 177: 155-188
[4] Aizenbud A, Gourevitch D, Krötz B, Liu G. Hausdorffness for Lie algebra homology of Schwartz spaces and applications to the comparison conjecture. Math Zeit, 2016, 283: 979-992
[5] Aizenbud A, Gourevitch D, Krötz B, Liu G. Erratum to: Hausdorffness for Lie algebra homology of Schwartz spaces and applications to the comparison conjecture. Math Zeit, 2016, 283: 993-994
[6] Bochnak J, Coste M, Roy M F. Real Algebraic Geometry. Berlin: Springer, 1998
[7] Borel A, Wallach N. Continuous cohomology, discrete subgroups,representations of reductive groups. Annals of Mathematics Studies, 1980: No 94
[8] Casselman W. Canonical extensions of Harish-Chandra modules to representations of $G$. Canad J Math, 1989, 41: 385-438
[9] Casselman W, Hecht H, Miliɩiɣ D. Bruhat filtrations and Whittaker vectors for real groups//Doran R, Varadarajan V. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics. Providence, RI: Amer Math Soc, 2000: 151-191
[10] Chen Y, Sun B. Schwartz homologies of representations of almost linear Nash groups. Journal of Functional Analysis, 2021, 280(7): 108817
[11] du Cloux F. Sur les représentations différentiables des groupes de Lie algébriques. Ann Sci Ecole Norm Sup,1991, 24(3): 257-318
[12] Hong J, Sun B. Generalized semi-invariant distributions on $p$-adic spaces. Math Ann, 2017, 367: 1727-1776
[13] Knapp A, Vogan D.Cohomological Induction and Unitary Representations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995
[14] Shiota M. Nash Manifolds.Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1987
[15] Shiota M.Nash Functions and Manifolds//Broglia F. Lectures in Real Geometry. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1996
[16] Sun B. Almost linear Nash groups. China Ann Math Ser B, 2015, 36: 355-400
[17] Sun B, Zhu C B. A general form of Gelfand-Kazhdan criterion. Manu Math, 2011, 136: 185-197
[18] Taylor J L.Notes on locally convex topological vector spaces. Lecture Notes, University of Utah, 1995
[19] Trèves F. Topological Vector Spaces, Distributions and Kernels. New York: Academic Press, 1967
Options
Outlines

/