ON DE FINETTI'S OPTIMAL IMPULSE DIVIDEND CONTROL PROBLEM UNDER CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY*

  • Wenyuan WANG ,
  • Ruixing MING ,
  • Yijun HU
Expand
  • 1. School of Mathematics and Statistics, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China;
    2. School of Mathematical Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China;
    3. School of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China;
    4. School of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China
Wenyuan WANG, E-mail: wywang@fjnu.edu.cn; Yijun HU, E-mail: yjhu.math@whu.edu.cn

Received date: 2022-09-18

  Revised date: 2023-07-23

  Online published: 2024-02-27

Supported by

Wenyuan Wang acknowledges the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12171405 and 11661074) and the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in Fujian Province University. Ruixing Ming acknowledges the financial support from the Characteristic & Preponderant Discipline of Key Construction Universities in Zhejiang Province (Zhejiang Gongshang University - Statistics), Collaborative Innovation Center of Statistical Data Engineering Technology & Application, Digital + Discipline Construction Project (SZJ2022B004).

Abstract

Motivated by recent advances made in the study of dividend control and risk management problems involving the U.S. bankruptcy code, in this paper we follow [44] to revisit the De Finetti dividend control problem under the reorganization process and the regulator's intervention documented in U.S. Chapter 11 bankruptcy. We do this by further accommodating the fixed transaction costs on dividends to imitate the real-world procedure of dividend payments. Incorporating the fixed transaction costs transforms the targeting optimal dividend problem into an impulse control problem rather than a singular control problem, and hence computations and proofs that are distinct from [44] are needed. To account for the financial stress that is due to the more subtle concept of Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the surplus process after dividends is driven by a piece-wise spectrally negative Lévy process with endogenous regime switching. Some explicit expressions of the expected net present values under a double barrier dividend strategy, new to the literature, are established in terms of scale functions. With the help of these expressions, we are able to characterize the optimal strategy among the set of admissible double barrier dividend strategies. When the tail of the Lévy measure is log-convex, this optimal double barrier dividend strategy is then verified as the optimal dividend strategy, solving our optimal impulse control problem.

Cite this article

Wenyuan WANG , Ruixing MING , Yijun HU . ON DE FINETTI'S OPTIMAL IMPULSE DIVIDEND CONTROL PROBLEM UNDER CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY*[J]. Acta mathematica scientia, Series B, 2024 , 44(1) : 215 -233 . DOI: 10.1007/s10473-024-0112-4

References

[1] Albrecher H, Thonhauser S. Optimality results for dividend problems in insurance. Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fäsicasy Naturales, Serie A, Matematicas, 2009, 103(2): 295-320
[2] Artin E. The Gamma Function.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964. English translation of German original, Einführung in die Theorie der Gammafunktion, Teubner, 1931
[3] Avanzi B. Strategies for dividend distribution: A Review. N Am Actuar J, 2009, 13(2): 217-251
[4] Avanzi B, Lau H, Wong B. Optimal periodic dividend strategies for spectrally positive Lévy risk processes with fixed transaction costs. Scand Actuar J, 2021, 8: 645-670
[5] Avanzi B, Lau H, Wong B. On the optimality of joint periodic and extraordinary dividend strategies. Eur J Oper Res, 2021, 295(3): 1189-1210
[6] Avram F, Palmowski Z, Pistorius M. On the optimal dividend problem for a spectrally negative Lévy process. Ann Appl Probab, 2007, 17(1): 156-180
[7] Avram F, Palmowski Z, Pistorius M.On Gerber-Shiu functions and optimal dividend distribution for a Lévy risk process in the presence of a penalty function. Ann Appl Probab, 2015, 25(4): 1868-1935
[8] Broadie M, Chernov M, Sundaresan S. Optimal debt and equity values in the presence of chapter 7 and chapter 11. J Finance, 2007, 62(3): 1341-1377
[9] Broadie M, Kaya O. A binomial lattice method for pricing corporate debt and modeling Chapter 11. J Financ Quant Anal, 2007, 42(2): 279-312
[10] Cheng X, Jin Z, Yang H. Optimal insurance strategies: a hybrid deep learning markov chain approximation approach. Astin Bull, 2020, 50(2): 1-29
[11] Cheung E, Wong J. On the dual risk model with Parisian implementation delays in dividend payments. Eur J Oper Res, 2017, 257(1): 159-173
[12] Constantin N.Convex Functions and Their Applications. A Contemporary Approach. New York: Springer, 2010
[13] Corbae D, D'Erasmo P. Reorganization or liquidation: bankruptcy choice and firm dynamics. Unpublished Working Paper. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2017
[14] Dai M, Jiang L, Lin J. Pricing corporate debt with finite maturity and chapter 11 proceedings. Quant Financ, 2013, 13(12): 1855-1861
[15] De Angelis T. Optimal dividends with partial information and stopping of a degenerate reflecting diffusion. Financ Stoch, 2020, 24(1): 71-123
[16] De Finetti B. Su un'impostazion alternativa dell teoria collecttiva del rischio//Trans XVth Internat Congress Actuaries, 1957, 2: 433-443
[17] Gerber H. Entscheidungskriterien fur den zusammengesetzten Poisson prozess. Mit Verein Schweiz Versicherungsmath, 1969, 69: 185-227
[18] Höjgaard B, Taksar M. Controlling risk exposure and dividends payout schemes: insurance company example. Math Financ, 1999, 9(2): 153-182
[19] Ikeda N, Watanabe S.Stochastic Differential Equations and Diffusion Processes. New York: North Holland-Kodansha, 1981
[20] Jacod J, Shiryaev A.Limit Theorems for Stochastic Processes. Second ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2003
[21] Jeanblanc M, Shiryaev A. Optimization of the flow of dividends. Russian Mathematical Surveys, 1995, 50(2): 257-277
[22] Jin Z, Liao H, Yang Y, Yu X. Optimal dividend strategy for an insurance group with contagious default risk. Scand Actuar J, 2021, 4: 335-361
[23] Kyprianou A.Introductory Lectures on Fluctuations of Lévy Processes with Applications. Berlin: Springer Science and Business Media, 2014
[24] Kyprianou A, Loeffen R. Refracted Lévy processes. Ann I H Poincare-PR, 2010, 46(1): 24-44
[25] Kyprianou A, Palmowski Z. Distributional study of de Finetti's dividend problem for a general Lévy insurance risk process. J Appl Probab, 2007, 44(2): 428-443
[26] Leland H. Corporate debt value, bond covenants,optimal capital structure. J Finance, 1994, 49(4): 1213-1252
[27] Li B, Tang Q, Wang L, Zhou X. Liquidation risk in the presence of Chapters 7 and 11 of the US bankruptcy code. J Financ Eng, 2014, 1(3): 1-19
[28] Li J, Liu G, Zhao J. OPtimal dividend-penalty strategies for insurance risk model with surplus-dependent premium. Acta Math Sci, 2020, 40B(1): 170-198
[29] Li X, Liu H, Tang Q, Zhu J. Liquidation risk in insurance under contemporary regulatory frameworks. Insur Math Econ, 2020, 93(1): 36-49
[30] Li Y, Zhou X. On pre-exit joint occupation times for spectrally negative Lévy processes. Stat Probabil Lett, 2014, 94(1): 48-55
[31] Loeffen R. On optimality of the barrier strategy in de Finetti's dividend problem for spectrally negative Lévy processes. Ann Appl Probab, 2008, 18(5), 1669-1680
[32] Loeffen R. An optimal dividends problem with transaction costs for spectrally negative Lévy processes. Insur Math Econ, 2009, 45(1): 41-48
[33] Loeffen R, Renaud J. De Finetti's optimal dividends problem with an affine penalty function at ruin. Insur Math Econ, 2010, 46(1): 98-108
[34] Loeffen R, Renaud J, Zhou X. Occupation times of intervals until first passage times for spectrally negative Lévy processes. Stoch Proc Appl, 2014, 124(3): 1408-1435
[35] Noba K. On the optimality of double barrier strategies for Lévy processes. Stoch Proc Appl, 2021, 131(1): 73-102
[36] Noba K, Pérez J, Yu X. On the bailout dividend problem for spectrally negative Markov additive models. SIAM J Control Optim, 2020, 58(2): 1049-1076
[37] Paseka A.Debt valuation with endogenous default and Chapter 11 reorganization. Working paper, University of Arizona, 2003
[38] Pistorius M. On exit and ergodicity of the spectrally one-sided Lévy process reflected at its infimum. J Theor Probab, 2004, 17(1): 183-220
[39] Pérez J, Yamazaki K, Yu X. On the bail-out optimal dividend problem. J Optim Theory Appl, 2018, 179(2): 553-568
[40] Renaud J. On the time spent in the red by a refracted Lévy risk process. J Appl Probab, 2014, 51(4): 1171-1188
[41] Renaud J, Zhou X. Distribution of the present value of dividend payments in a Lévy risk model. J Appl Probab, 2007, 44(2): 420-427
[42] Shreve S, Lehoczky J, Gaver D. Optimal consumption for general diffusions with absorbing and reflecting barriers. SIAM J Control Optim, 1984, 22(1): 55-75
[43] Wang W, Wang Y, Chen P, Wu X. Dividend and capital injection optimization with transaction cost for spectrally negative Lévy risk processes. J Optim Theory Appl, 2022, 194(3): 924-965
[44] Wang W, Yu X, Zhou X.On optimality of barrier dividend control under endogenous regime switching with application to Chapter 11 bankruptcy. arXiv:2108.01800
[45] Wang W, Zhou X. General drawdown-based de Finetti optimization for spectrally negative Lévy risk processes. J Appl Probab, 2018, 55(2): 513-542
[46] Zhu J, Siu T, Yang H. Singular dividend optimization for a linear diffusion model with time-inconsistent preferences. Eur J Oper Res, 2020, 285(1): 66-80
Options
Outlines

/