PRIMAL HYBRID FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR PARABOLIC PROBLEMS WITH GRADIENT TYPE NON-LINEARITY

  • Ravina SHOKEEN ,
  • Ajit PATEL ,
  • Divay GARG
Expand
  • 1. Department of Applied Science and Humanities, World College of Technology and Management, Farukh Nagar, Gurgaon, Haryana 122506, India;
    2. Department of Mathematics,The LNM Institute of Information Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302031, India;
    3. Department of Applied Science, Galgotias College of Engineering and Technology, Knowledge Park-II, Greater Noida, G.B. Nagar, U.P. 201310, India
Ravina SHOKEEN, E-mail: ravinashokeen@outlook.com; Divay GARG, E-mail: divaygarg2@gmail.com

Received date: 2023-11-20

  Revised date: 2024-01-08

  Online published: 2026-05-22

Supported by

The first two authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the DST-FIST program (Govt. of India) for setting up the computing lab facility called Center for Mathematical & Financial Computing (C-MFC) at the LNM Institute of Information Technology under the scheme "Fund for Improvement of Science and Technology" (FIST-No. SR/FST/MS-I/2018/24). The third author is supported by CSIR research fellowship.

Abstract

This article develops the primal hybrid finite element method with Lagrange multipliers to approximate nonlinear parabolic initial-boundary value problems with gradient type non-linearity.A modified elliptic projection is used to produce optimal order error estimates for the semi-discrete and backward Euler-based complete discrete schemes. In addition, error estimates in $L^{\infty}$-norm are established which are optimal in nature. Superconvergence result of the gradient in $L^{\infty}$-norm is discussed for the error between the primal hybrid solution and elliptic projection. As a bi-product, the proposed analysis provides optimal error analysis for non-conforming CR-elements.Finally, numerical tests are performed to validate the theoretical findings.

Cite this article

Ravina SHOKEEN , Ajit PATEL , Divay GARG . PRIMAL HYBRID FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR PARABOLIC PROBLEMS WITH GRADIENT TYPE NON-LINEARITY[J]. Acta mathematica scientia, Series B, 2026 , 46(2) : 1011 -1035 . DOI: 10.1007/s10473-026-0225-z

References

[1] Acharya S K, Patel A. Primal hybrid method for parabolic problems. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 2016, 108: 102-115
[2] Acharya S K, Porwal K. Primal hybrid finite element method for the linear elasticity problem. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2022, 435: 127462
[3] Akrivis G, Li B, Lubich C. Combining maximal regularity and energy estimates for time discretizations of quasilinear parabolic equations. Mathematics of Computation, 2017, 86: 1527-1552
[4] Akrivis G, Li B. Linearization of the finite element method for gradient flows by Newton's method. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 2021, 41: 1411-1440
[5] Axelsson O. Error estimates for Galerkin methods for quasilinear parabolic and elliptic differential equations in divergence form. Numerische Mathematik, 1977, 28: 1-14
[6] Brenner S C. Forty years of the Crouzeix-Raviart element. Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, 2014, 31(2): 367-396
[7] Brenner S C, Scott L R.The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Method. New York: Springer, 2008
[8] Brezzi F, Fortin M.Mixed on Hybrid Finite Element Methods. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991
[9] Ciarlet P G.The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1978
[10] Crouzeix M, Raviart P A. Conforming and non-conforming finite element methods for solving stationary Stokes equation. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis-Modélisation Mathématique et Analyse Numérique,1973, 7: 33-75
[11] Douglas J J, Dupont T, Wheeler M F. A quasi-projection analysis of Galerkin methods of parabolic and hyperbolic equations. Mathematics of Computation, 1978, 32: 345-362
[12] Dryja M, Tu X. A domain decomposition discretization of parabolic problems. Numerische Mathematik, 2007, 107(4): 625-640
[13] Gsell, Matthias A F, Steinbach O. A mortar domain decomposition method for quasilinear problems. Domain Decomposition Methods in Science and Engineering XXIII. Cham: Springer, 2017: 333-343
[14] Li B, Ueda Y, Zhou G. A second-order stabilization method for linearizing and decoupling nonlinear parabolic systems. SIAM Jounal of Numerical Analysis, 2020, 58: 2736-2763
[15] Li B, Sun W. Error analysis of linearized semi-implicit Galerkin finite element methods for non-linear parabolic equations. International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modelling, 2012, 10(3): 622-633
[16] Li B, Sun W.Unconditionally optimal error analysis of fully discrete Galerkin methods for general nonlinear parabolic equations. arXiv: 1303.6410
[17] Li D, Wang J. Unconditionally optimal error analysis of Crank-Nicolson Galerkin FEMs for a strongly nonlinear parabolic system. Journal of Scientific Computing, 2017, 72(2): 892-915
[18] Milner F A. A primal hybrid finite element method for quasi-linear second order elliptic problems. Numerishe Mathematik, 1985, 47: 107-122
[19] Nie Y Y, Thomée V. A lumped mass finite element method with quadrature for a non-linear parabolic problem. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis,1985, 5: 371-396
[20] Pany A K, Khebchareon M, Pani A K. Negative norm estimates and superconvergence results in Galerkin method for strongly nonlinear parabolic problems. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 2021, 99: 26-36
[21] Park E J. A primal hybrid finite element method for a strongly nonlinear second-order elliptic problem. Numerical Methods of Partial Differential Equations, 1995, 11: 61-75
[22] Patel A, Pani A K, Nataraj N. Mortar element methods for parabolic problems, Numerical Methods of Partial Differential Equations.2008, 24: 1460-1484
[23] Pian T H H, Tong P. Basis of finite element methods for solid continua. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1969, 1: 3-28
[24] Quarteroni A. Primal hybrid finite element methods for 4th-order elliptic equation. Calcolo, 1979, 16: 21-59
[25] Raviart P A, Thomas, Primal hybrid finite element method for second order elliptic equations. Mathematics of Computation
1977, 31: 391-413
[26] Robert J E, Thomas J M.Mixed and Hybrid Methods//Ciarlet P G, Lions J L. Handbook of Num Anal. Amesterdam: North-Holland, 1991: 523-639
[27] Shi D, Wang H, Li Z. A lumped mass nonconforming finite element method for nonlinear parabolic integro-differential equations on anisotropic meshes. Applied Mathematics-A Journal of Chinese Universities, 2009, 24(1): 97-104
[28] Shi D, Zhang B. Nonconforming finite element method for nonlinear parabolic equations. Journal of System Science and Complexity, 2010, 23: 395-402
[29] Shokeen R, Patel A, Pani A K. Primal hybrid method for quasilinear parabolic problems. Journal of Scientific Computing, 2022, 92: Art 10
[30] Sulman M H M, Nguyen T B, Haynes R D, Huang W. Domain decomposition parabolic Monge-Ampére approach for fast generation of adaptive moving meshes. Computers and Mathematics with Applications,2021, 84: 97-111
[31] Tang H S, Haynes R D, Houzeaux G. A review of domain decomposition methods for simulation of fluid flows: concepts, algorithms,applications. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2021, 28: 841-873
[32] Thomée V. Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Parabolic Problems. Berlin: Springer, 1984
[33] Thomée V, Xu J C, Zhang N Y. Superconvergence of the gradient in piecewise linear finite element approximation to a parabolic problem. SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis,1989, 26: 553-573
[34] Wheeler M F, Whiteman J R. Superconvergent recovery of gradients on subdomains from piecewise linear finite element approximations. Numerical Methods of Partial Differential Equations, 1987, 3: 65-82
[35] Wheeler M F, Whiteman J R. Superconvergence of recovered gradients of discrete time/piecewise linear Galerkin approximations for linear and nonlinear parabolic problems. Numerical Methods of Partial Differential Equations, 1994, 10: 271-294
Options
Outlines

/